... if the quantity of energy from universe is constant, that is, if energy cannot be destroyed, but only transformed from a state in an another state, than outer nothing cannot be, therefore absolute nothing cannot be, that is nothing both inside and outside, cannot be. If the empty space is indestructible, than the same it holds.On the content of the idea of nothingBy our experience of relative nothinge.g., an empty box or by the experince of relative destruction e can arrive, by mental operations, at the idea of absolute nothing, by extension. Or by thinking at a continuously reduction of a cognitive content of an ideae.g., e can arrive until the idea of 0. As e can arrive at the idea of infinit...That is, by increasing continuously someho an cognitive content.But, any idea in order to be understooded should to have a content. This idea of absolute nothingness is not any idea and, in order to be understooded it should not be even considered an idea. Thus, the idea of absolut nothingness should not have a content because it can not be understooded, because it is not an idea. Thus, idea of nothing cannot be understooded ithout starting or relating it ith something positive content. It can be understooded not relating it to anything outside its sphere, outside nothingness. I relate it only to itself, to nothingness but I dont get anyhere. 0 is understooded relative to quantity. The empty can be understooded only relative to matter or physical and space and time. That is hy, the idea of nothing have, hoever, a content...it is not merely negation, in addition is the negation of all that is . I dont agree it has a content because you gave it one. It is not the negation because it gave birth to all that is but the definition ground, the condition that makes posible everything.On the other hand, e must to understand that the idea of nothing is something material, is a material state of a material system. Only together it is inteligible. single have not any meaning. Even single, have a content, although not a meaningful the key content.On the other hand, e must to understand I dont beleive you can make philosophy ith this kind of expresion philosophy is the groundithe nothingnesss of possibilities, not of certitudes that the idea of nothing is something material, is a material state of a material system. Therefore, the idea of nothing does not involve an ideatic nothing.Hoever, e can think someho at the idea of absolute nothing positive content, but this idea is not content-empty. e can anticipate the idea of absolute nothing, but e cannot arrive to it...My fundamental idea is that there can be no absolute empty-content ideaBut, the content can come from many sensorial systems, not only from visual system.And, many animals have contents.I think that, that there are animals ith better senses than humans...That is, hy mental opertationsprocessingscomputationsare very important.As as argued by Quartz and Sejnosky in The neural basis of cognitive development , evolution of cognition lead to a more flexible capacity of forming free representation...but, as they argue, development also involve an increase of the complexity of representations...not a reduction to nothing...Therefore, a depeer understanding of everithing involve more logicalscientificrational coerence of all that is from bothom to top.Nothing cannot increase the inteligibility. I fear that idea of nothing is a sterile one.Metaphysicschemistry.Metachemistrybiology.Over there idea of nothingAbout the relation beteen any posible mind and human brain1.Human brain is a concretmaterialisation of an ontologically posible system.2.The set of all the posible systems depend on the properties of ontological primitiveprimitives, on their numerical quantity, on the trans-contextual conditions and on the specific contextual conditions.2 The relations are determined by the nature of relates and by other contextual parameters.3. An ontologically posible mind is not a product of human brain, but it is a human discovery.4. The posible minds, the properties of ontologicall primitiveprimitives, the las of universe, are not products of human mindtheir existence is not conditionated by humans humans cannot exist if they ould not existhumans discover only hat is related to their existenceit is imposible to even imagine ho much more ior ho knos, lesssthere ould be they had existed before the life apparition and can to exist if life ould no longer exist. 5. The posibility of human brain is implicated by the properties of ontological primitiveprimitives, by their sufficient quantity and by some specific contextual conditions. 6. hat is physically posible do not depend at all on the imagination of brain, but only on the universal and local physical constraints.7. Implementation of a certain ontologically posible mind may be not independent of human brain, but hat is ontologically posible in every context in space and time ill never depend on human brain.8. Question hat is the necessary level of universe Is there something indestructible in the Universee can to conceive the hole space being empty.But, e cannot to imagine something aspatial. it doesnt mean it doesnt exist9. Is there something more primitive than the empty space in universe10. Is there something that ouldcan affect the space itselfOk, I understood that you are a totaly materialist guy but I dont think that you can be able to have anything to do ith philosophy if you dont take the ideal dimension in consideration. You are a half-philosopher.As a kind of conclusionNeither science nor animal cognition, evolutionarily speaking, do not begin ith the nothing-content, but ith some content, at least a sensorial content. I guess i beleive that nothingness has to do ith existence rather than to cognition, it is a state of being, hich you ill experiment. I have an advice for all thinkers, especially for me dont think any more of the absolute NOTHINGNESS because you ill have time even infinite to do so in hich you just might regret the time spent no doing it.e do not start from nothing-content, but e anticipate this idea starting from some content. More than simplicity e ant inteligibility, and this involve not only isolates primitives, but also relations, structures, processes etc.e should to arrive not to the idea of nothing, but to the coerence of the hole existence...to the understanding of all that is hy, does it really help. And this is not thanks to the idea of nothing.Humans and the hole existence ill never participate toard idea of nothing. okNeither are e started, nor e should to arrive at the idea of nothing.e should to arrive at the understandig of all that is, all that as, all that ill be and finally to understanding all that can benothingness absolute and all that cannot be to an ultimate but coerent understanding of all ...and to the discovery of those posibities that ill make eus happy. Not to nothing.Neither simplicity nor economy is our ultimate and nece...
Download