...in defend himself during his sho trial in 1938The purpose of this investigation is to find out ho and to hat extent did Nikolai Bukharin defend himself hen he as put on trial, accused of a ide range of charges, during the Purges of 1936-1938. In order to carry out this investigation, a series of mainly primary sources ill be consulted. These include, first and foremost, the transcripts of Bukharins interrogation during the trial and his last plea, then Bukharins last letter in prison, Stalins speech that marked the break ith Bukharin, a telegram from the American ambassador to Mosco, and, as a secondary source, Robert Conquests The Great Terror a reassessment , a standard book on this period.The summary of evidence ill contain a presentation of Bukharins background and events before the trial and the resume of the trial and of its aftermath. The analysis ill sho to hat kind of charges Bukharin confessed to, hy, and hat defence did he make.B. Summary of evidence 1. Bukharins background and events before the trialNikolai Bukharin as born in Mosco 1888 and joined the Bolsheviks in 1906, being exiled for illegal activities in 1911. After the March revolution of 1917 he returned to Russia and orked alongside Lenin, in order to gain poer for the Bolsheviks. He disagreed ith the peace of Brest-Litovsk and supported the idea of socialism in one country. After many disagreements ith Lenin, he recanted and as seen as a member of the Right ing of the Party. The NEP is seen as his creation. After Lenins death, Bukharin supported Stalin in continuing the NEP and against Zinoviev and Kamenev, but hen Stalin made theGreat Turn, Bukharin opposed him. In a speech in 1928, Stalin asked the C.C. to condemn the Right opportunist, capitulatory platform of Bukharin, Tomsky and Rykov, to condemn the attempt of Bukharin and his group to form an anti-Party bloc ith the Trotskyites. Bukharin lost his post in the C.C. and became editor of the Izvestia until 1937, hen he as arrested for treason.In prison, Bukharin as tortured an order of beating permitted as recovered and his ife and infant son ere threatened, hich made him confess to a series of charges. Still, he had the poer to rite to Stalin, to tell him that he understands hy Stalin initiated the Purge and that he has to die, and to deny the charges, fearing that Stalin believes them.2. The trialThe trial, in hich Bukharin and seventeen others ere accused, opened on the 2nd of March 1938. The indictment as comprehensive and included charges such as planning to assassinate Lenin and Stalin ,assassinating Kirov and Gorky, spying for foreign poersJapan, England, Germany, planning to overthro Soviet poer and to instigate an attack from the outside. Andrei Vyshinsky represented the prosecution.hen Bukharin as interrogated he began by pleading guilty to belonging to a counterrevolutionary bloc of Rights and Trotskyites., being one of its leaders, planning to overthro the Soviet poer by force, ith the help of England, Japan and Germany and to give them territory , to eaken the defensive poer by recking, planning to assassinate important members of the Soviet government, planning a coup detat and planning to arrest Lenin, Stalin and Sverdlov .Hoever, he then started to deny that he had been in favour of recking, that he had taken part in the assassination of Kirov or that he had anted to kill Lenin, that he had spied for Austria, America and Japan, that he had knon anything about negotiations ith hiteguard circles or German fascists, and that he had planned to give Byelorussia to the Poles. After that, Bukharin admitted that he had had contacts ith Socialist Revolutionaries and Mensheviks abroad, but refused to admit that he had accepted to open the front to the Germans. The itnesses brought to confirm the prosecutions theory about the plan to assassinate Lenin ere Varvara Yakolevka, Mantsev and Ossinky. The first one confirmed Vyshinskys story completely, but Bukharin shoed that there had only been conversations about arresting Lenin for 24 hours, hich as knon by everybody. The others made more restricted accounts, omitting the points against Bukharin. Again, Bukharin denied the charges. In his last plea, on the 12th of March, Nikolai Bukharin maintained the same line, accepting that he had planned to overthro the Soviet poer, had planned kulak uprisings, had collaborated briefly ith the Left Socialist Revolutionaries, but continued to deny that he took part in the assassination of Kirov, had orked ith the fascists, that he had given any instructions for recking activities. Hoever, he said that he as an enemy of socialism and rejected the defence he ould get in the est.Nikolai Bukharin as found guilty on all charges and shot on the 14th of March 1938, only to be rehabilitated in 1988. C. Evaluation of sources To of the sources used ereThe Case of the Anti-Soviet Block of Rights and Trotskyites, Red Star Press, 1973, page 369-439, 767-779. found on HYPERLINK http.marxists.orgarchivebukharinorks1938trial http.marxists.orgarchivebukharinorks1938trial, 5-03-2004It is a very valuable primary source as it contains the records of Bukharins trial. The transcription of the trial is a normal procedure, transcripts hich can later be studied by historians. It as published by the Soviet authorities, hich had not yet rehabilitated Bukharin, ith the intention of giving veridicity to the trial and its value is that it shos exactly hat happened, hat questions ere asked and hat ansers ere given. Its limitations might be that some of hat as said as not published, in order to keep certain things secret though unlikely, that during the translation process mistakes might have been made or that the managers of the site have not put everything on the Internet again unlikely. If one ants to investigate the truth behind the trial, this source should be used ith great care, because it shos only hat happened in the hall and says nothing of hat happened during the preliminary interrogation.Conquest, Robert, The great terror, a reassessment, Hutchinson, London, 1990 p 341-398This is a standard book on this period, assembled from a variety of primary sources. For the chapter regarding the trial, Conquest obtained his information mainly by studying the transcripts, but not only. He makes references to other primary sources also, such as Bukharins last letter to his ife, here he denounced the charges. Its purpose is to provide an evaluation of the hole period of the Purges and it is valuable by the amount of information and by Conquests analysis, ho explains Bukharins strategy. Hoever, its limitations are that it doesnt bring very much ne evidence for one ho has read the transcripts and that Conquest is a ell-knon totalitarian, tending to put all the blame for the Purges on Stalin. D. AnalysisFirst of all, the trial came during the period of the Purges, hen Stalins aim as to get rid of former Bolsheviks and obtain poer for himself. He had arranged similar sho trials before...
Download